• 14/07/2022
• By wizewebsite
• 510 Views

Invisible dog Lidové noviny Finland: Is it possible to talk about homosexuality differently than positive?<

Probably as where.Päivi Räsänen, MEP of the Finnish Parliament for Christian Democrats, former head of this party and former Minister of the Interior, knows about it.In addition, a woman who confesses biblical Christianity.

And as a believing woman respecting biblical teachings, she advocates a biblical attitude towards homosexuality.So negative.The Bible teaches, in accordance with the provisions of the Creator: the intimate relationship between a man and a woman yes (and solely), homosexuality is in the eyes of the Creator's eye.

We don't like it, but that's how it is.And in the spirit of this biblical teaching, Päivi Räsänen is publicly expressed.

In normally and not an extremely political-corporate functioning world, it should not have a problem-and we would probably not know yes to it.But that's not the case.She has a problem.And not small.

On Thursday, April 29 (2021), the Finnish radio and TV website YLE informed that Räsänen was indictment for the alleged hateful manifestations:

The accusation concerns her texts published on the Luther Foundation Finland website, the spiritual reform movement, and the Missionary Organization Finnish Evangelical Lutheran Mission.Furthermore, her posts on social networks (Twitter, Instagram, Facebook) and the YLE PUHE radio show.

In all these statements, she held a biblical attitude to marriage and homosexuality, which the General Prosecutor Raija Toivianen evaluated as a derogatory and discriminatory expression against homosexuals that violate their dignity and the principle of equality.Written and verbal manifestations of politicians are said to exceed the boundaries of freedom of speech and freedom of religion and can be interpreted in such a way that they can incite intolerance, contempt and hatred.

Räsänen opposes the fact that he defends the biblical principles and does not shame homosexuals, for it is of the opinion that their human dignity and human rights must be respected and defended.

Contradiction in terms?Never.Whoever is able to distinguish will understand.Because coincidentally, I look at homosexual issues as well as the accused politician, I know very well what my opinion on homosexuality, homosexualism and homosexual practices (including feelings of them, witness their speeches in public*) - on the one hand;On the other hand, I fully respect their human and civil rights and the right to human dignity.(But not their "right" give new content to established deadlines, eg to include an officially confirmed relationship between the same -sex couple in the term.)

/*/ No one has ever solved and will solve my feelings of absolute disgust accompanied by lifting the stomach when I see two men leading to the hand and kissing in the public space.It is something I have to deal with in some way, and I never thought that I should deal with it differently than myself.I mean, with the help of some kind of activism or even state power.

The defendant Räsänen has problems with her views for a long time.E.g.In 2019, therefore, the Lutheran Evangelical Church in favor of fashion homosexual processes was publicly opposed.On her Twitter she published a picture of an open Bible with an excerpt from the letter of the Apostle Paul to the Roman Corps (Epistola to the Romans, Chapter 1, verses 24 to 27), where we read:

Therefore, God left them to the impute passions of their hearts, so they dishonored their own bodies;They exchanged God's truth for a lie and worship and serve the creation instead of the Creator - he will be praised for ages!Amen.Therefore, God has published them in too shameful passions.Their wives confused natural intercourse for unnatural, and as well as men left natural intercourse with women and ignited each other, men with men perform shame and thus receive deserved retribution for their misleading.

On the basis of biblical teaching, she expressed her belief that the Christian Church should take a different than a helpful attitude to homosexual activities.That also made her time in the indictment.

Päivi Räsänen, however, stands behind her.He says that he will go to the court with a calm and brave mind and confidence that Finland is a constitutional state where freedom of expression and freedom of faith is guaranteed.

According to her, the beliefs based on Christian faith are not a mere formality."Initial Christians did not renounce their faith even in the lion's pit, so why should I give up my belief in the courtroom." She does not intend to give up her worldview, nor does he plan to "dismiss" anything from what she wrote.“I will not even apologize for what the Apostle Pavel wrote.I am ready to prevent freedom of speech and freedom of religion if necessary. ”

And that's exactly what.

To put it without a napkin: we are witnessing a deterrent form of political-corporate extremism.Päivi Räsänen is tried to express his opinion, which should be warning.Homosexual lobby and its sympathizers reached another base.They are in the offensive.

Let us recall the monstrous paradox.Western society likes to claim that they stand on the Jewish-Christian foundations (next to the ancient).But when someone publicly defends the elementary principles of these foundations, just like Päivi Räsänen, faces criminal prosecution, is dragged in courts and threatens to criminal.

The ADF International server (International Alliance for Freedom Defense) wrote that Päivi Räsänen faces three lawsuits and for each can go to prison for up to two years.

Further evidence that we do not live in the normal world.At the same time, the efforts to equalize homosexuals have once begun so innocent.But today we are somewhere else.It is no longer the rights of homosexuals who continue to increase their claims, but the right of others freely express our opinion on everything in homosexuality.

The Päivi Räsänen case creates an atmosphere of fear, non -freedom, car censorship.Another with scary fruits of political correctness.Yes, so far in Finland.And tomorrow?

Taken from the author's blog with his permission.