• 20/03/2022
  • By wizewebsite
  • 623 Views

Koukalová & Konečný: We agreed to sex before sex. Do you really want to live like this one day?<

Unfortunately, the Danish iConsent application, ie iSouhlas, is unfortunately not available for the Czech Republic, and logically, it is grafted onto their legislation and the law that came into force this year. This law states that any sexual act may be required for rape without it with the clear consent of both or all (if you are Danes, for example, and you like the Swedish troika).

Until the new law came into force, in the case of rape, it was necessary to prove that the accused had committed violence, so in short, such a standard of guilt and punishment, but now you just have to give someone without proof and the person is in hell.

So we sadly looked at the heart icon in the shape of two shaking hands on Google Play, when you can just see the screens of the application and a preview of Bjorn and Jessica, who on December 9, 2020 at 21:58 agreed to sex and then had time to have sex at any time within 24 hours.

And when Bjorn or Jessica remembers being raped on December 9 from 9:58 to December 10, 2020 to 9:58 PM, all they have to do is pull out iConsent in court, where their encrypted consent is stored in history. and will be painted.

Note that it has more than a thousand downloads.

But the two of us, such a small application as limited to the Danes, was not discouraged, and because what is already in Europe is almost a corner for us, we have downloaded an application that has a global format. Her name is Say Yes.

It promises to help people in today's world make simpler and smarter decisions, and is here to give users safety by giving their consent to sex. It is said that just a few clicks and you can enjoy without stress. Logging in is not complicated, it works on the principle of logging in via Facebook or e-mail, you connect right away and it's similar to Tinder, for example, you have your profile, then all you have to do is make friends with a friend in bed. So the two of us had to join each other in friends and we already agreed to sex.

Because we were sitting in our canteen at lunch at the time, we did not consent to sex. Firstly, because there were people all around, and secondly, we were also more excited about lunch (Peter had a hamburger and Bara a doll). In the end, we don't know how we would explain this perfect experiment to Peter's wife without unnecessary confusion on all sides.

It's true that the app looks pretty primitive, but when we started subscribing to sex again, we were a little confused about how it worked. When you allow sex, you will see on your profile who you have asked for permission and to whom you have given permission. But if you want to revoke your consent to sex, it is no longer possible, there is one additional agreed sex hanging in the application.

So what about that now?

Can you sleep with someone extra that day? Or does it work as a bonus for samohana? The devil knows, or an activist could explain it to us, because their stupidity makes these things happen.

Bara confirmed her consent to sex for Peter and now we don't have to worry about anything.

Unlike the Danish application, which keeps your consent to sex in a similar encryption, you have no history here, in fact, you can allow and cancel sex over and over again. After a while, the two of us stopped having fun, so we decided to find other people who would like to have sex with us, and to at least get it somewhere, we both took a profile photo, Petr has a "duck face" there, of course. because what else.

We came across a boy named James, who had 52 agreed sexes, so Bara sent him a request and now we are waiting to see what will happen. (Nothing has happened yet, James is of course an application designed profile.)

Koukalová & Konečný: Dali jsme si souhlas před sexem k sexu. Vážně chcete takhle jednou žít?

James has 52 consents to sex and Bara has one approved and one extra without consent. You can also request consent with a QR code.

According to a cursory survey, this application is full of avatars, for example, James is definitely a photo downloaded from the Getty Images photo bank, and Jessica88, who has agreed to sleep with him, is a photo downloaded from Shutterstock. However, you can upload a video with consent to sex directly from the application, which will then be stored in memory (see in the title of the article), or you can send a QR code to your sexual partner and give his consent by accepting it.

You can also upload a consent video in the application.

Because this matter works globally for all states, of course it has no legislative coverage, in fact, with the Czech nature, it can turn into a mess for everything, such as "A million moments for sex" or "Consents for the collection of eyelids", etc.

It ends up that normal people, not aggressors, are more afraid

No more fun and playing with our future, the Danish application is upside down when developers had the good will to produce something that would give the Danes hope, but the Danish media is making fun of it, although it should rather ridicule the law that it arose when someone also had to write it and then accept it.

Of course, the application is not liked by activists who obviously would not like someone to have any proof in their hands that they did not change their minds, when it happens somewhere in seven years, as is often the case now, when people lose their jobs and careers. only on the basis of some claim that has not yet been proven.

via GIPHY

Imagine an ordinary situation. The two meet in a restaurant, have a bottle, are in the bedroom together in an hour and suddenly someone says no…

" If the other undresses and enthusiastically reciprocates what you do, it is clear that you have consent. And if you're not sure, it's better to ask. For example: Should I continue? That's enough, it's not a science and it doesn't cost anything, " says Johanna Nejedlová, to whom we will return.

That's right, people don't normally do that science. When someone says no, most society is sane and stops. And when someone asks if they can go on or start asking questions, the whole sex is over once or twice, because there's really nothing more exciting than a similar discussion in bed.

The whole action of approving sex attacks the normal world and common sense people, creating just chaos, confusion and distrust in the average person, because the usurper or rapist will cough up your consent and simply marry you.

Legislation that will unconditionally punish violence, including harassment and abuse, will not help you, it will not help you to target young people with any ideas that bartenders will be watching you somewhere if you are packing properly.

"We want to create a network of companies that do not tolerate harassment. We will train their bartenders, security guards and other employees so that they know how to react when someone comes to complain. It's important to show people that they don't have to like it and they can get in touch. Everyone imagines we'll have cops there to do some flirtation guards. But we would rather make the staff people empathetic and sensitive. And the person who feels he is being harassed was helped when he asked for it, " said Johanna Nejedlová, a women's rights activist, in an interview with Flowee.

We grew up in the wild 90's and even the last disco in our village worked on its own, so that when someone bothered us, you were either handy and managed yourself, or you just had to really tell the bartender or bouncer and it was painted. Quite often, it happened that at the bar, the people behind him or the throwers watching the place know it themselves and intervene. People know from themselves what to do, and society is able to cope, no one still has to tell it and train it (for grants) what to do.

It is evident that this is not a focus on the problem of violence, but a focus on collective guilt.

In the end, normal people are more afraid than real rapists.

"We start from the fact that not all men are aware that they have raped in their partner's life. Most people think of rape as a bloody scene full of violence, but rape may look completely different, for example when a woman tells her partner she doesn't want sex and he still has it because she says she's not in the mood, but when they start, I'll convince her. He does not consider the fact that he forced her to act as rape at all. But the rape is. That's why it's necessary to talk about how important it is to communicate with your partner and perceive signals, if the other person really wants sex with you, " says Nejedlová, who now jumps around every corner and seems to speak for us all.

So far, we only benefit from the fact that almost everyone at home is raping , so we don't know what to do now, because we both experienced sex "I'm not in the mood and the taste, give me peace", but we don't consider it rape, so we're confused. and we don't know if we should report those people back now. There are even situations like this, and it is good that we read about them when the principle of revenge cannot be ruled out, especially in divorce proceedings, where two people unscrupulously accuse their partner of rape and even child abuse in an attempt to get their children into care .

And we write the word partner, but we mean women honestly.

On the Internet, women advise on how to accuse their husbands of sexual assault on children.

Unfair divorce practices, women falsely accuse their husbands of sexual abuse.

The husband sexually abuses the child, lies to the mother in a divorce for revenge.

This is only a fraction of a fraction of headlines, and now you certainly want to point out that these are exceptions and these are mainly children, just as we could point out that every partner or spouse is not a rapist and there is no reason to scare us in advance. For all women now, there are those who have unspecified experiences from the past, when alcohol on both sides played a role, men are sexual aggressors, so it is probably no wonder that they have prepared an application for fucking Danes, where they would prefer every sex. to save.

Let's deal with the violence that has taken place, not what will not happen

It doesn't matter that in every second Wife Exchange, we see a guy attacking his wife and the children looking at it quite apathetically. Alcohol, unemployment, execution and the excluded region mostly play a role in this. Where there is the greatest danger, attention is not focused at all, but again it is focused on normal sex, free sex and dating. We are getting closer and closer every day, someone is constantly telling you that there is an epidemic of violence and rape by friends, loved ones and partners, so there is room for anything that should limit normal human interaction and consent is needed.

Enlightenment should aim to ensure that everyone, not just women (beware!), Report all forms of violence and turn to the police with confidence, not that we are guarded by an application or bartenders, and that every potential partner or friend is a future rapist. We are not upset, we understand what prevention people think, but the Danish application, the primitive version of which you can find in global accessibility, is only a logical consequence of all that we should take care of violence that has already taken place, not to fight him where it has not yet happened and never has to happen, because where there is no prosecutor, there is no judge.

We know that our headline encourages us not to take it lightly, but we just want to tell you that we still have a basic belief in the basic sanity of people who don't attack anyone and take the word "no" as no, without ever they needed another activist, another fiftieth nonprofit or a terrifying application, and when we still believe that the best defense against the biggest nonsense and especially the restriction of other freedom and human will (which we already have so little, damn it!) is the best defense humor, exaggeration and in fact, perhaps even a silent request that you leave us alone, emphasize trust, especially in the responsible authorities, and stop blaming us all around. We really don't know what we should be before, whether racists, radicals, xenophobes, transpobes, predators, "rioters" or rapists.

Otherwise, we will all do it, including those who now want to "save" us from ourselves. Or do you really think that people living before the year 2000 couldn't handle it on their own? Clogs from antiquity have already done it.

Photo gallery

View photo gallery